Legal Opinion
Ross v. Forzani
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 5, 2005No. AC 25463PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The plaintiff, Alan L. Ross, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, Carlo Forzani, after the court granted the defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiffs complaint. On . appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court acted improperly in striking his complaint. We do not address the merits of his claim because we conclude that the plaintiff waived his right to appeal in this case. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following allegations and procedural history, as reflected in the record, are relevant to the plaintiffs appeal.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Royce v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Noble v. MarshallConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- P & L Properties, Inc. v. Schnip Development Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rudder v. MAMANASCO LAKE PARK ASS'N, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Justin LUND v. MILFORD HOSPITAL, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Bross v. Hillside Acres, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Lund v. Milford Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- State v. BozelkoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.