Legal Opinion

Huff v. Huff

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1934No. 24972. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This is a divorce action. The plaintiff sought a decree on the ground of personal indignities. The defendant resisted the divorce, and filed a cross-complaint in which she asked for separate maintenance. At the conclusion of the trial, the court indicated that, if the defendant would recast her pleading and ask for a divorce, a decree would be awarded to-each of the parties, but the defendant refused to comply with the suggestion. The court found that the parties had been guilty of personal indignities upon each other, and entered a decree for a divorce, as asked for in the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schirmer v. NethercuttWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Gibson v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Poropat v. Olympic Peninsula Motor Coach Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. McMillan v. McMillanWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Nordlund v. NordlundWashington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Sutton v. MathewsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hokamp v. HokampWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Moore v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Werner v. WernerWashington Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API