Hokamp v. Hokamp
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The parties to this action were married in December, 1921. They have had no children. During the first ten years of their married life, the appellant continued her vocation as a teacher and, during a portion of that period, contributed more to the support of the family than did the respondent. In 1931, the respondent obtained employment with the Texas Company and, at the time of the trial, occupied a responsible position with it, receiving $489.92 a month “take home” pay. The parties had accumulated property worth approximately forty-one thousand dollars and had liabilities of approximately…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Huff v. HuffWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- McMillan v. McMillanWashington Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by10 opinions
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Burch v. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Howay v. HowayIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Ruprecht v. RuprechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Best v. BestWashington Supreme Court · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.