Legal Opinion
Soltex Thread Co. v. Rueff Bros.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 16, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (McQuillan, J.), entered October 10, 1984, denying the motion of defendant and third-party plaintiff Great American Surplus Lines Insurance Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the motion granted.
In this action to recover $393,530.40 from various defendants for water damage sustained between September 29 and October 1,1981, plaintiff seeks $46,765.20 in damages from Great American, which insured it under a “Difference in Conditions” policy providing coverage for, inter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Proc v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Fotochrome, Inc. v. American InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Rosenthal v. Reliance InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Fotochrome, Inc. v. American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Kaufman v. Republic InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blitman Construction Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Fabozzi v. Lexington InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Costello v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- S. Lee Cabe v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Klockner Stadler Hurter Ltd. v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990