Legal Opinion
Klockner Stadler Hurter Ltd. v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 11, 1990No. 89 Civ. 8063 (KC)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CONBOY, District Judge:
Currently pending before the Court are two motions by the defendants, the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (“ICSP”), National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh (“NUFI”), and American International Underwriters Corporation (“AIU”). First, the defendants seek to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(7) and 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to join an indispensable party. Second, the defendants move to dismiss for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). For the reasons…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- American Protein Corporation v. Ab Volvo and Volvo Lastvagnar Ab, as Successors in Interest to Beijerinvest Ab, Beijer Industries, Inc. And Bo LyckeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Maltz v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- 6247 Atlas Corp. v. Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Zinaman v. USTS New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Allstate Insurance v. Administratia Asigurarilor De StatDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.