Kaufman v. Republic Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorándum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. The record establishes unequivocally that communications and letters were exchanged between plaintiff’s lawyer and the insurer over an extended period of time, before and after an action at law was barred by the policy provisions. But the record fails to establish in evidentiary form, as distinguished from argumentative conclusions, that the insurer ever receded from its contention that plaintiff had submitted and was persisting in the assertion of a fraudulently exaggerated claim. This is not the stuff of…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Blitman Construction Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hoesen v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Soltex Thread Co. v. Rueff Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.