Legal Opinion

Linnet v. Hitchcock

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1984No. 900PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal arises from an Order dismissing plaintiff-appellant’s exceptions and denying recovery to either party in an action in assumpsit before a judge sitting without a jury.

Appellant, the plaintiff below, John W. Linnet, t/d/b/a Ideal Park Enterprises, instituted the within suit in April, 1980, against appellees, defendants below, Floyd Hitchcock, Jr. and Al Leonzi, t/d/b/a Keystone All-Star Sports Camp. The action arose as a result of an oral agreement entered into by the parties in June, 1979, for the use of Ideal Park, a recreation and camping complex owned by appellant. 1 Appellees…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lombardo v. Gasparini Excavating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Zvonik v. ZvonikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Myers-Macomber Engineers v. M. L. W. Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Brenna v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Colish v. GoldsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. EBC, Inc. v. Clark Building System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Atacs Corporation Airtacs Corporation, in 97-1812 v. Trans World Communications, Inc., in 97-1813. Nos. 97-1812, 97-1813Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  3. Greene v. Oliver Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Z & L LUMBER OF ATLASBURG v. NordquistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Helpin v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API