Legal Opinion

Hutchison v. Canon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original Proceeding in Habeas Corpus. ., Original application for writ of habeas corpus, by John Hutchison, alleging that he is illegally restrained of his liberty and confined in the county jail of Canadian county by John M. Canon, sheriff of said county, acting under and by virtue of an order of Justice John C. Tarsney.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Keaton, J.:

The sole question presented for determination in this case is whether or not the husband, being a party to an action for divorce and alimony, can be imprisoned for a greater period than ten days for the purpose of enforcing a compliance with an order of the trial court or judge requiring him ^o pay a certain specified sum monthly as temporary alimony after said party, upon a proper hearing, has been adjudged in contempt for a refusal to obey such order.

The order complained of, omitting the formal parts, reads as follows:

• “On this December 23, 1807, this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Andrew v. AndrewSupreme Court of Vermont · 1889
  2. Staples v. StaplesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  3. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. In re FanningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Ex parte SweeneyNevada Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BighorseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Seneca Coal Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Wells v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Ex Parte HiblerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Pyle v. HoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API