Legal Opinion

Wilson

California Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1888No. 12496PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Application for a writ of mandate to the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

In a certain action for divorce brought against petitioner, William I. Wilson, by his wife, in the superior court of Alameda County, the said court on February 1, 1887, made an- order requiring petitioner to pay plaintiff therein two hundred dollars per month alimony and eight hundred dollars counsel fees. On April 25, 1887, the said court committed petitioner to the custody of the sheriff until said money should be paid; and since that date petitioner has been in jail under said orders. The petition states that on December 8, 1887, the petitioner, after due notice, applied to the respondent,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Wezel v. Van WezelNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. People ex rel. Backus v. SpaldingNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  3. People ex rel. Crouse v. CowlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. In re WatsonNew York Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Jackson v. BillingsNew York Supreme Court · 1803

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ex parte SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. United Railroads of San Francisco v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Brooks v. EdgingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Ex Parte LevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Ex parte BeaversWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API