Legal Opinion

Ex parte Sweeney

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1883No. 1167PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Application for discharge of petitioner upon habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

At Chambers,

Hawley, C. J.:

Petitioner, upon a regular hearing had, was adjudged guilty of contempt of court, for disobedience to the decree and injunction in the case of Phillips v. Welch, 11 Nev. 187, in appropriating more water than he was entitled to by said decree. For this contempt he was fined five hundred dollars, and the commitment under which he is held declares that “if said fine be not paid forthwith,” the petitioner is to be “imprisoned in the county jail of Ormsby county * * * for the space of two hundred and fifty days; that is to say, at the rate of one day for each and every…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cartwright's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Whittem v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Phillips v. WelchNevada Supreme Court · 1876
  4. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City Council of Reno v. Reno Newspapers, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ex parte WhitmoreUtah Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Levan v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1896
  4. South Fork Band of the Te-Moak Tribe v. State Engineer of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Ex parte BergmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API