Costar v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant has moved to dismiss this breach of contract suit on the grounds of res judicata and collateral estoppel. It contends — and we agree — that all the material issues of fact and law raised in this suit were litigated and determined adversely to the plaintiffs in a prior and nearly identical suit for injunctive relief they filed in the United States District Court. We therefore grant the government’s motion on collateral estoppel grounds.
I
A. In 1967, the plaintiffs entered into a 25-year lease of a tract of land in the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Shenango River Reservoir Project…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Richard Nixon v. Honorable Charles R. Richey, United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Taunton Gardens Company v. Carla HillsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway And Park District Of PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.