Legal Opinion

Costar v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 17, 1981No. 68-80LPublished

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant has moved to dismiss this breach of contract suit on the grounds of res judicata and collateral estoppel. It contends — and we agree — that all the material issues of fact and law raised in this suit were litigated and determined adversely to the plaintiffs in a prior and nearly identical suit for injunctive relief they filed in the United States District Court. We therefore grant the government’s motion on collateral estoppel grounds.

I

A. In 1967, the plaintiffs entered into a 25-year lease of a tract of land in the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Shenango River Reservoir Project…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Richard Nixon v. Honorable Charles R. Richey, United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. Taunton Gardens Company v. Carla HillsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  5. Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway And Park District Of PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API