Legal Opinion

Richard Nixon v. Honorable Charles R. Richey, United States District Court for the District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 14, 1975No. 75-1063PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner filed in this court a petition for a writ of mandamus directing a District Judge to immediately grant a pending application for a three-judge court to hear and determine a case challenging the constitutionality of an act of Congress, and instructing the judge to give that case priority over three consolidated cases pending before him as a single judge. In a prior opinion, 1 we held that the judge had to rule on the three-judge application and had to defer the priority question to the three-judge court if convened. We denied the requested writ, however, as unnecessary to compliance…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Moore v. AspinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
  3. Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Richard Nixon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. Southern Pacific Communications Company v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API