Richard Nixon v. Honorable Charles R. Richey, United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Petitioner filed in this court a petition for a writ of mandamus directing a District Judge to immediately grant a pending application for a three-judge court to hear and determine a case challenging the constitutionality of an act of Congress, and instructing the judge to give that case priority over three consolidated cases pending before him as a single judge. In a prior opinion, 1 we held that the judge had to rule on the three-judge application and had to defer the priority question to the three-judge court if convened. We denied the requested writ, however, as unnecessary to compliance…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Moore v. AspinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Richard Nixon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Southern Pacific Communications Company v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.