Legal Opinion

State v. Glaraton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1988No. C9-87-893PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

This appeal presents the issue whether the court of appeals erred when it vacated a 240-month sentence following respondent’s conviction of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree. The original sentence imposed by the trial court represented a departure slightly more than four times the maximum presumptive sentence duration provided in the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines (58 months when offense was committed by one having a criminal history of 1). We hold the court of appeals properly affirmed the respondent’s conviction; but we hold it erred in ruling that the departure…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. Van GordenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. StummSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. State v. HerbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Dillon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. State v. HalvorsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API