Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Martin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 17, 1929No. 19271PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, C.
Thankful J. Martin, defendant in error here and plaintiff in the court below, ¡began this action on June 30, 1927, to recover upon a promissory note, payable on demand, in the sum of $750, together with interest and an attorney’s fee, executed July 2, 1920, by W. J. Thompson, payable to R. W. Martin. This note was af-terwards indorsed to the plaintiff, Thankful J. Martin. It also showed by indorsement certain credits.
As an answer,' the defendant, W. J. Thompson, admitted the execution of the note, pleaded payment of same, denied the indorsement of credits which appear thereon,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Berry v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Burns v. VaughtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- B. S. Flersheim Mercantile Co. v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Poynter v. Beacon Falls Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Shawnee Nat. Bank v. MarlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- Browne v. BassettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- First State Bank v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Every v. EverySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Peters v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Storrie Coal Co. v. McAlester Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.