Werner v. Bowers
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
This is an action to rceover damages for malicious prosecution. On a second trial, the jury found a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $3,000, which the trial judge reduced to $1,000. From the judgment entered for this amount defendant appealed to the Superior Court, which affirmed. Our allocatur brought the case here for review.
We can see nothing malicious in the prosecution. Defendant, as landlord, had issued a distress warrant, to collect rent from a tenant. The latter’s household goods had been levied upon and were awaiting sale. The next door neighbor heard…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Altman v. Standard Refrig. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Taylor v. American International Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Groda v. American Stores CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Farneth v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Roessing v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Simpson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Sicola v. First Nat. Bk. of AltoonaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Stritmatter v. NeseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Hubert v. Alta Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Heisey Et Ux. v. VansantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.