Legal Opinion

Hubert v. Alta Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1939No. Appeal, 71PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This action for malicious prosecution has been tried three times in the court below and once before appealed to this court.

In the former appeal, reported in 130 Pa. Superior Ct. 277, 196 A. 513, the background of the case, including the favorable termination of the criminal proceedings instituted against the plaintiff, a former agent, by the manager of the defendant insurance company upon a charge of embezzlement and fraudulent conversion as an insurance agent, ivas fully set forth. We there held that the evidence adduced by the plaintiff, Hubert, at the second trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Altman v. Standard Refrig. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Taylor v. American International Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Groda v. American Stores CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. McClafferty v. PhilpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Aland v. PyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Griffiths v. Cigna Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Weiss v. EquibankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Wainauskis v. Howard Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Biggans v. Hajoca Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. 63 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1205, 61 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,108 Jackey B. Griffiths v. Cigna Corporation, Marlene Graham, Individually and in Her Own Official Capacity as Head of Security With Cigna Corp. Cigna Corporation and Marlene GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API