Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Cowan

California Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1955No. L. A. 23183PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

By his complaint in this action plaintiff sought to have it declared that he was not under obligation to pay defendant an amount agreed upon as compensation for sevices rendered by defendant in procuring a lease of certain real property for plaintiff. Defendant by cross-complaint sought to recover said compensation from plaintiff. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant, and plaintiff has appealed.

From the trial court’s findings it appears that E. D. Mitchell owned certain real property in the city of Long Beach. Plaintiff was desirous of leasing the property from Mitchell and, on October…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Christensen v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Shaffer v. BeinhornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Rhode v. BartholomewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hurney v. LockeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Skopp v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Loughlin v. Idora Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Homefinders v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API