Legal Opinion

Gill v. Col-Tex Refining Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided April 24, 1940No. C. A. No. 63PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLRED, District Judge.

Plaintiff sues defendant for commission. The complaint is in two counts.

The first count is upon an alleged contract made during the year 1938, with Verne D. Sanders and F. R. Sproule, alleged agents of defendant, agreeing to pay plaintiff a gallon upon all emulsions sold by defendant to anyone with whom plaintiff should put the defendant in touch; and that as a result of plaintiff’s efforts defendant sold 1,400,000 gallons of its products to Nueces County, Texas.

The second count alleges, in the alternative, that plaintiff procured the sale of such products to Nueces…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas French & Sons, Ltd. v. Carleton Venetian Blind Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
  2. Sonken-Galamba Corporation v. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1939
  3. Radtke Patents Corp. v. RabinowitzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lester v. Isbrandtsen Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1950
  2. Woods v. KornfeldDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Grogan v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, W.D. New York · 1950
  4. Keegan v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API