Malpeli v. State
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker
¶ 1 Faith Malpeli brought an inverse condemnation action against the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT), seeking compensation for the alleged taking of her property as a result of the reconstruction of Montana Highway 191 near Big Sky, Montana during a highway safety improvement project. A jury found that MDT had not taken a property right belonging to Malpeli, and therefore did not reach the question of compensation. Malpeli appeals, arguing that the District Court erred by (a) denying Malpeli’s motions for judgment as a matter of law or a new trial; (b) excluding Malpeli’s appraiser…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Iowa State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Members of the Peanut Quota Holders Association, Inc., Augustus Garrett, Jerome Paulk, Faye Paulk, and D.U. Pullum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McClue v. Safeco InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- Kirk White v. State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Masters Group International, Inc. v. Comerica BankMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- Victory Insurance v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- Tonner v. CirianMontana Supreme Court · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.