Legal Opinion

Malpeli v. State

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2012No. DA 11-0593PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶ 1 Faith Malpeli brought an inverse condemnation action against the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT), seeking compensation for the alleged taking of her property as a result of the reconstruction of Montana Highway 191 near Big Sky, Montana during a highway safety improvement project. A jury found that MDT had not taken a property right belonging to Malpeli, and therefore did not reach the question of compensation. Malpeli appeals, arguing that the District Court erred by (a) denying Malpeli’s motions for judgment as a matter of law or a new trial; (b) excluding Malpeli’s appraiser…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Iowa State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  5. Members of the Peanut Quota Holders Association, Inc., Augustus Garrett, Jerome Paulk, Faye Paulk, and D.U. Pullum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McClue v. Safeco InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Kirk White v. State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Masters Group International, Inc. v. Comerica BankMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Victory Insurance v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Tonner v. CirianMontana Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API