Legal Opinion

Mettart v. Allen

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1894No. 16,965PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDailey, J.

This action was brought by the appellant, Mettart, against the appellee, Mary Allen, to quiet the title •of said Mettart to certain real estate described in his complaint. The appellee filed a cross-complaint in the case, making the appellant George T. Kepler a party thereto, for the reason that he held a mortgage on said land, and in her cross-complaint set up a mortgage covering a part •of the premises claimed by the appellant, executed to her deceased husband, John Allen, on the 10th day of January, 1885, to secure the payment of a note calling for the sum of four hundred dollars, which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Pence v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Haley v. AmestoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Richards v. SniderOregon Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bank of New York v. NallyIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Wienke v. LynchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Szakaly v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Loser v. Plainfield Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Cumberland Building & Loan Ass'n v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API