Legal Opinion

Bank of New York v. Nally

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 2005No. 29S02-0405-CV-214PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that a mortgage recorded before a deed to the mortgagor is recorded but after the deed is dated and delivered is within the mortgagor's chain of title as of the time of recording. We also hold that equitable subrogation is an appropriate remedy and available to a subsequent mortgagee who pays off the senior mortgage in total.

Factual and Procedural Background

This is a dispute between the Bank of New York and Tod D. and Pamela E. Owens, husband and wife, over the priority of their mortgages on a residence in Hamilton County. In capsule form, Mr. and Mrs. Owens sold the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Birke v. AbbottIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Keybank National Ass'n v. NBD BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Worman Enterprises, Inc. v. The Boone County Solid Waste Management DistrictIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Meyer v. Marine Builders, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Sees v. Bank One, Indiana, N.A.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Bank of America, NA v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bank of America v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Pond v. McNellisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Siwinski v. Town of Ogden DunesIndiana Supreme Court · 2011

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API