Legal Opinion
Richards v. Snider
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Appeal from Umatilla County.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Watson, C. J.:
This is a suit for specific performance. The contract sought to be enforced is in wilting, and in the following form:
“This agreement made between D. A. Richards and Wm. A. Snider, as a settlement of all matters of difference be*198tween them up to this date, witnesseth: That said Richards is to pay to said Snider the> sum of fifty dollars in gold coin, and said Snider is to execute and deliver to said Richards a good and sufficient deed or conveyance of lot 8, sec. 19, 4 N., 35 E., as soon as patent is received from the United States, and said sum of $50 to be then due…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parkhurst v. Van CortlandCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1816
- Wilson v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1878
- Purinton v. Northern Illinois RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Clark v. PowersIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Dougherty v. PurdyIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by13 opinions
- Higgins v. Insurance Company of North AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Marriner v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Black v. Pratt Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Belt Et Ux. v. MatsonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Guillaume v. K. S. D. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.