Legal Opinion

Richards v. Snider

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Umatilla County.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Watson, C. J.:

This is a suit for specific performance. The contract sought to be enforced is in wilting, and in the following form:

“This agreement made between D. A. Richards and Wm. A. Snider, as a settlement of all matters of difference be*198tween them up to this date, witnesseth: That said Richards is to pay to said Snider the> sum of fifty dollars in gold coin, and said Snider is to execute and deliver to said Richards a good and sufficient deed or conveyance of lot 8, sec. 19, 4 N., 35 E., as soon as patent is received from the United States, and said sum of $50 to be then due…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parkhurst v. Van CortlandCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1816
  2. Wilson v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Purinton v. Northern Illinois RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Clark v. PowersIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Dougherty v. PurdyIllinois Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Insurance Company of North AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Marriner v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Black v. Pratt Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Belt Et Ux. v. MatsonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Guillaume v. K. S. D. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API