Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Heckler
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 5, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-398PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION REVERSING AND SETTING ASIDE DECISION OF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Celestine Taylor seeks review under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) of the Secretary of Health and Human Services’ (“Secretary”) decision denying her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (Act) and for Supplemental Security Income benefits under Title XVI of the Act. Both applications hinge on Ms. Taylor’s claim that she is disabled under the Act.
In November 1983, this Court reviewed and reversed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Helene Marcus v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Martin v. ApfelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Davis v. ShalalaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Banks v. ASTUREDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Guthrie Ex Rel. Powe v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Lockard v. ApfelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.