Legal Opinion
Guthrie Ex Rel. Powe v. Astrue
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2009No. Civil Action 05-029 (CKK)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Currently pending before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment of Reversal and Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Affirmance, respectively, of the decision of an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denying Supplemental Security Income Benefits (“SSIB”) to Plaintiff Jemal Powe, who has brought suit by and through his mother Taneta Guthrie, pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act. After reviewing the parties’ briefs, the administrative record, and the relevant case law and statutory authority, the Court shall DENY Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jackie L. HAYS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Sandra Blakes, on Behalf of Lamanuel Wolfe, Jr., a Minor v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Florida Municipal Power Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Davis v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Contreras v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Jeffries v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Little v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Dowell v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.