Legal Opinion
Lockard v. Apfel
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 3, 2001No. CIV.A. 00-1752HHKJMFPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter has been referred to me by Judge Kennedy for all purposes. Plaintiff brings this claim for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. A. §§ 401-423,1381-1383(1991).
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Linda M. Lockard (“Lockard”), is a 47-year-old woman with a high school education and past relevant work experience as a dental clerk and secretary. At some point in 1991, plaintiff suffered two strokes, which resulted in pain and spasms…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Frances Buxton v. William A. Halter, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Robert J. Lauer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Helen Lewin v. Richard S. Schwieker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- ADEMAKINWA v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Sloan v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Gilliland v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Paris v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Ellison v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.