State v. Casey
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Green, J.:
William Casey appeals from his sentence for one count of possession of cocaine in violation of K.S.A. 65-4160. The sole argument raised by Casey is that the trial court erred in sentencing him to prison under K.S.A. 21-4603d(f)(3) instead of ordering him to complete mandatory drug abuse treatment under K.S.A. 21-4729. We agree with Casey’s argument. Applying the rules of statutory construction and examining the legislative history of K.S.A. 21~4603d(n) and K.S.A. 21-4729, we determine that the legislature intended for the provisions of K.S.A. 21-4603d(n) and K.S.A. 21-4729 to trump…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. StallingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. BreedloveSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. RichardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. AndeltSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- McGuire v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Stanley v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
- State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- United States v. Coffeyville Resources RefiningDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.