Legal Opinion

State v. Gardner

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 14, 2011No. 103,312Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

Under Kansas law, a judge has extensive discretion to order a defendant to complete certain tasks as a proviso of probation. But the exercise of that discretion cannot thwart the clear intent of the Legislature expressed in a specific statute. In other words, a judge cannot use his or her discretion, granted in a general statute, to ignore the clear commands stated in a specific statute. Here, as a condition of probation, the sentencing court ordered Glen Gardner to pay all $121 of the costs of an alcohol monitor he was required to wear as a condition of release from jail before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. CottSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API