Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Krosch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 17, 1939No. 31,827PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This garnishment is to recover from the garnishee as insurer the amount of a judgment for which plaintiff claims it is liable under a policy of liability insurance issued on April 9, 1937, to Martin county. The policy, insured the county as the named insured against damages to persons or property caused by the operation of a certain automobile. It contained a so-called omnibus clause defining the word “insured” so as to include “not only the named insured, but also any person while using the automobile * * * provided that the declared and actual use of the automobile is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. IckesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Peterson v. MaloneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Home Telephone Co. v. Michigan Railroad CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Olson v. ShephardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Mesaba Loan Co. v. SherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Esser v. BropheySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. American Fidelity & Cas. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Leskinen v. PuceljSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Sexton v. County of WasecaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API