Legal Opinion

Leskinen v. Pucelj

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 11, 1962No. 38,099PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

This action is brought by plaintiff, Andrew T. Leskinen, as a taxpayer of the town of Balkan in St. Louis County, to recover from the defendants in their various capacities as town treasurers, town supervisors, and surety, amounts which plaintiff alleges were unlawfully disbursed out of town funds. The action was tried without a jury to the district court and defendants were found liable. They appeal from an order denying their alternative motions for amended findings or a new trial.

The basic issues presented on appeal are, first, whether the town treasurers and their surety are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Diamond v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Pugnier v. RamharterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Minnesota Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. County of St. LouisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  3. Queen City Construction, Inc. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Gephart v. Hospital Facility Building CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Op. Atty. Gen. 161b-12, Minnesota Attorney General Reports1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API