Legal Opinion
United States v. Harrington
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided May 6, 2021No. 21-0025/AFPublished
1Opinion of the Court
This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Matthew C. HARRINGTON, Staff Sergeant United States Air Force, Appellant No. 21-0025 Crim. App. No. 2020-02 Argued February 10, 2021—Decided May 6, 2021 Military Judges: Christopher M. Schumann (arraignment) and Bryan D. Watson (trial) For Appellant: Captain Alexander A. Navarro (argued); Mark C. Bruegger, Esq. For Appellee: Major Dayle P. Percle (argued); Colonel Shaun S. Speranza, Lieutenant Colonel Matthew J. Neil, and Mary Ellen Payne, Esq.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- Rashad v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.