Haynes & Boone v. Bowser Bouldin, Ltd.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEnoch, Justice
Bowser Bouldm, Ltd. (Bouldin) recovered judgment for malpractice and violation of the Deceptive Trades Practices — Consumer Protection Act (DTPA), Tex.Bus. & Com.Code §§ 17.41-.63, against its law firm Haynes & Boone for the firm’s handling of Bouldin’s suit with Blockbuster, Inc. Bouldin elected DTPA damages. The trial court awarded Bouldin damages for the loss of investment in a shopping center in which Blockbuster was a tenant, the deficiency balance Bouldin was obligated to pay when the center was foreclosed upon by its creditor, the cost of settlement of the Blockbuster litigation, lost…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Morgan v. Compugraphic Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Alamo National Bank v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Rourke v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Best v. Ryan Auto Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by183 opinions
- Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- Union Pump Co. v. AllbrittonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Ford Motor Co. v. LedesmaTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Brown v. Bank of Galveston, National Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Alexander v. Turtur & Associates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.