Legal Opinion

Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. Otto

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion by plaintiff for rehearing of case reported in 96 Mich. 558.

1Per curiam

Upon a motion for rehearing counsel seek again to discuss the law of the case. 96 Mich. 558. The case of Wardle v. Townsend, 75 Mich. 385, in no way impairs the force of the case of Union Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Spaulding, 61 Mich. 77, the questions involved not being the same. We see no reason for changing our view of the law.

Counsel now attack the decision of this Court upon its understanding of the facts, reinforcing the findings of fact, which alone we can recognize, by the testimony given upon the trial. Had the circuit judge found as matter of fact that the assessments sued for were not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wardle v. TownsendMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. OttoMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Union Mutual Fire Ins. v. SpauldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Nichol v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Peake v. YuleMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API