Legal Opinion

Union Mutual Fire Ins. v. Spaulding

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Case made from Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff assigns error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Defendant was sued asa member of the Mutual Insurance Company, which is plaintiff, for the proportion calculated according to his premium note on an assessment. He surrendered his policy May 1, 1884, and on that day paid $100, which was his full proportion of the only assessment then outstanding, and that' assessment- had been *80called for $19,759.86, which covered all losses existing at the time it was made, and a further sum of $1,683.99 for estimated expenses and shortages.

In November, 1881, a deficiency of $3,791.98 remained unpaid on this assessment, in addition to a further loss claim of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hyde v. . LyndeNew York Court of Appeals · 1850

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vincent v. Germah InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Wardle v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. OttoMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. OttoMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API