Legal Opinion

Arrant v. Georgia Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 18, 1924No. 6 Div. 982PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The propositions of law upon which appellant bases his right to recover under his pleas of recoupment are thus stated by his counsel in their brief:(1) Property rights exist in information, and one who spends time, money, labor, and thought in codifying and tabulating information is the owner of it.(2) Such owner may communicate such information to another without thereby destroying his property rights in it, and one who acquires such information by virtue of a confidential relationship with the owner, or for a contractually limited purpose, cannot use it for other purposes to the prejudice…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Witkop v. BoyceNew York Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Cella Commission Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. F. W. Dodge Co. v. Construction Information Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Belcher v. Birmingham Trust National BankDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1968
  2. Port Investment Co. v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. VandergriffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Maddox v. HuntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Miller Insurance Agency v. Home Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API