Legal Opinion
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Vandergriff
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 25, 1936No. 24729PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
Hoke Vandergriff brought an action for damages against Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Gus Reynolds, Claude Mason, and William Starnes, alleged to be agents and servants of the Goodyear Companjq alleging in substance that he was in the trucking business in Atlanta; that Gus Reynolds telephoned five named tire dealers in the City of Atlanta and competitors of the Goodyear Company, represented himself to be Vandergriff, and indicated to the dealers that he was in the market for a quantity of tires; that as a result of these misrepresentations Reynolds procured from each of these dealers…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Bazemore v. Savannah HospitalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Associated Press v. International News ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Board of Trade v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Arrant v. Georgia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
3Cited by23 opinions
- Crump v. Beckley Newspapers, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Sidis v. FR Pub. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Cabaniss v. HipsleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Gill v. Curtis Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Fairfield v. American Photocopy Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.