Legal Opinion

Fry v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1956No. Civ. 8710PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a money judgment in an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution and from the orders of the court denying its motion for a new trial and its motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

The plaintiffs, because of Mr. Fry’s work as a mechanic on construction jobs, had lived in various parts of the state. Likewise because of the nature of his work they lived in a house trailer. Their permanent address, however, was the residence of their son-in-law at Redding. For several years, wherever they happened to be, they did all of their banking with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. BrinkmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Centers v. Dollar MarketsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Sandoval v. Southern California Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Hudson v. ZumwaltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Bernstein v. MaimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Jackson v. BeckhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Weber v. LeuschnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Pepper v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Northrup v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API