Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Beckham
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 1963No. Civ. 7086PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.
In this action by plaintiff-respondent Lee Jackson for damages for malicious prosecution against defendants-appellants Euel Beckham, Buel Beckham and Beckham Bros., a copartnership, it is alleged that plaintiff was an employee of defendants and desired to take time off to move some of his furniture from Beaumont to Cottonwood, about 640 miles from Beaumont, where his wife was opening a small business; that defendants wanted plaintiff to return earlier than suggested; and that plaintiff took off for two weeks. In the meantime, he was arrested for petty theft.
It appears that plaintiff, during…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Halberstadt v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- White v. BrinkmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Esau Awabdy v. City of Adelanto Scott Burnell Ted Hartz Richard Althouse, Michael Sakamoto, Does I-X, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Minasian v. SapseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Union Oil of California, Amsco Div. v. WatsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Ayala v. KC Environmental HealthDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.