Legal Opinion

State v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 23, 1994No. 10-90-07017C; CA A71065PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

The state seeks reconsideration of our opinion in State v. Stewart, 123 Or App 147, 859 P2d 545 (1993), because the last two paragraphs of the opinion are inconsistent with one another. The state is correct. Defendant’s last assignment of error was not preserved. State v. Farmer, 317 Or 220, 224, 856 P2d 623 (1993). Accordingly, we modify the opinion to withdraw the paragraph in which we considered that assignment.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. FarmerOregon Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Stewart/BillingsOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. TravaliniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. CasavanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API