State v. Stewart/Billings
Oregon Supreme Court
(Cases Consolidated for Argument and Opinion)
1Opinion of the Court
*4VAN HOOMISSEN, J.
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the sentencing courts erred in denying defendants’ motions to preclude the use of their juvenile adjudications in calculating their “criminal history scores” under the sentencing guidelines. The Court of Appeals affirmed the sentencing courts’ rulings. State v. Stewart, 123 Or App 147, 151, 859 P2d 545 (1993), adhered to as modified on reconsideration, 126 Or App 456, 867 P2d 794 (1994); State v. Billings, 124 Or App 682, 865 P2d 1340 (1993). We also affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendant Stewart was convicted by a jury…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. WoodruffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. LaMunyonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- State v. SpeedisOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. TriceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.