Legal Opinion
Truckers United for Safety v. Mead
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 26, 2002No. Civ. 98-2793(TFH)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS F. HOGAN, Chief Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Plaintiffs seek reimbursement for their fees and expenses incurred in successfully challenging as ultra vires specific acts of the Department of Transportation’s Office of Inspector General (“DOT OIG”). Having considered plaintiffs’ motion, defendant’s opposition thereto, and plaintiffs’ reply, the Court will grant plaintiffs’ motion.
Background
On November 17, 1998, Truckers United for Safety (“TUFS”), a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Brigadier General Roland F. Cinciarelli v. The Honorable Ronald Reagan, President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- F.J. Vollmer Company, Inc. v. John W. Magaw, Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, U.S. Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Air Transport Association of Canada v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Application of MgndichianDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Taucher v. RainerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Back Country Horsemen of America v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Gengler v. United States ex rel. Department of Defense & NavyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- BACK COUNTRY HORSEMEN OF AMERICA v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.