Legal Opinion
People v. Lathigee
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 2, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [4]). Defendant contends that two property receipts, which were signed by the owner of the weapon found in the possession of defendant, constitute Rosario material that the People failed to disclose. We disagree. The receipts, signed by the owner when he retrieved his property from the police, do not contain statements, factual accounts or descriptions of the events underlying the charges; therefore, they do not constitute…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. DurgeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. WolfNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. CallendarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. WhitenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. BordersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. WedlingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. SpirlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000