Legal Opinion
Irving Air Chute Co. v. Russell Parachute Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 3, 1930No. 728PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, District Judge.
Three patents relating to parachute packs are here in issue. In each Floyd Smith is the patentee. All are owned by the Floyd Smith Aerial Equipment Company, one of the plaintiffs. The other plaintiff, Irving Air Chute Company, Inc., holds a license thereunder that is exclusive save for a nonexclusive license to the United States. Russell Parachute Company, the defendant, manufactures a parachute pack which, plaintiffs charge, infringes claims 1, 2, 3, '4, and 10 of patent No. I, 340,423 granted May 18, 1920, claims 1, II, 12, 15, and 18 of patent No. 1,462,456 granted…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Van Meter v. Irving Air Chute Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1928
- Floyd Smith Aerial Equipment Co. v. Irving Air Chute Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1921
- Fruit Growers' Express Co. v. MassieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Woodward v. OliverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- People v. HaasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Charles H. Demarest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Charles H. Demarest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959