Hart v. Prudential Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Plaintiff commenced this action to recover on an insurance policy issued by defendant. Defendant filed its cross-complaint demanding rescission of the policy on the ground of fraud. Plaintiff recovered the sum of $500, the face amount of the policy. From the judgment defendant appeals.
The court found as facts that on October 10, 1938, one Beaty, a solicitor of defendant, called at plaintiff’s home to solicit her to purchase a policy of insurance on the life of her daughter Laura Jene. Finally yielding to Beaty’s entreaties plaintiff signed an application for a “Twenty Year Payment Life Weekly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Layton v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Madsen v. Maryland Cas. Co. of BaltimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Lyon v. United ModernsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Goldstone v. Columbia Life & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Weiss v. Policy Holders Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The Continental Insurance Company of New York, New York, a Corporation v. Richard B. CottenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Byrd v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Boggio v. California-Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951