Legal Opinion

Hart v. Prudential Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1941No. Civ. 13093PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover on an insurance policy issued by defendant. Defendant filed its cross-complaint demanding rescission of the policy on the ground of fraud. Plaintiff recovered the sum of $500, the face amount of the policy. From the judgment defendant appeals.

The court found as facts that on October 10, 1938, one Beaty, a solicitor of defendant, called at plaintiff’s home to solicit her to purchase a policy of insurance on the life of her daughter Laura Jene. Finally yielding to Beaty’s entreaties plaintiff signed an application for a “Twenty Year Payment Life Weekly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Layton v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Madsen v. Maryland Cas. Co. of BaltimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Lyon v. United ModernsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Goldstone v. Columbia Life & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. Weiss v. Policy Holders Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Continental Insurance Company of New York, New York, a Corporation v. Richard B. CottenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Byrd v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Boggio v. California-Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API