Legal Opinion
Schenebeck v. Sterling Drug, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided October 22, 1968No. LR-66-C-248PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HENLEY, Chief Judge.
This products liability case, in which federal diversity jurisdiction is established, was tried to Court and jury during the week of September 9 of the current year. At the close of plaintiffs’ case and again at the close of all of the testimony defendant moved for a directed verdict. To the extent that the motions were based on certain grounds they were overruled; to the extent that they were based on other grounds ruling was reserved.
The case was submitted to the jury which after deliberating several hours returned a verdict of $40,000 in favor of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sterling Drug, Inc., a Corporation v. Maxine F. CornishCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Elbert Berry HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Joseph J. Ricciuti v. Voltarc Tubes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Florence Wright and Roy Wright v. Carter Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Burton v. TribbleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Martin v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Mrs. Jewell Schenebeck and Russell Schenebeck v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Warrington v. Charles Pfizer & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Adkison v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.