Legal Opinion

Chung Kao v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 22, 2016No. D067519PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McConnell, p. j.—

INTRODUCTION

Inmate Chung Kao appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for writ of mandate. The petition sought to compel the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (Department) to process a disciplinary appeal Kao submitted in 2012. The trial court dismissed the petition after sustaining the Department’s demurrer without leave to amend on the grounds the petition was untimely and Kao had failed to establish justification for the delay in filing it.

Resolving this appeal principally requires us to decide what limitation period applies to Kao’s petition. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. W. R. Grace & Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Gong v. City of FremontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Munoz v. Earthgrains Distribution, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
  2. Sandler v. Modernizing Medicine, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API