Southern Pacific Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice
The plaintiff and its connecting carriers during the year 1917, and again during the years 1920 and 1921, transported large amounts of armor plate for the Government from points in the East to Mare Island or other places in California. The principal question arises upon the applicability of certain rates, the contention of the Government being that commodity rates specified in the tariff should be applied and the plaintiff urging that as to part of the shipments, those made in 1917, a contract rate for the transportation was made, and as to the later shipments, those made in 1920 and 1921, a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1921
- Southern Pacific Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- James Shewan & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
- Greyhound Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.