Legal Opinion

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 2, 1927No. C-63PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice

From the stipulation of facts upon which the case was submitted it appears that the plaintiff “ for itself and other carriers participating in the movements ” furnished transportation to the Army in the months of July, August, and *488October, 1916. It presented its three several bills for the service upon the basis of proper fares, which the disbursing quartermasters paid as rendered without any deduction therefrom. If this suit was to recover for the service thus rendered in 1916 it would be barred by the statute of limitations of six years, because suit was not brought until March 14, 1923.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Baird v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Little v. District of ColumbiaUnited States Court of Claims · 1884
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  5. Atlantic Works v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API