Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 11, 1925No. 285PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford

The Southern Pacific Company, having carried certain persons as passengers at the request of the Government and received payment for such transportation at land-grant rates, brought this action to recover the difference between the rates thus paid and the full tariff rates. The Court of Claims, on its findings of fact, being of opinion that the claimant by its,course of proceeding and acceptance of the land-grant rates was precluded from the recovery of the balance of the full tariff rates, entered judgment dismissing the petition. 59 Ct. Cls. 36.

The facts found, shortly stated, are as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Oregon—Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Western Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Baker v. WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. James Shewan & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  5. United States v. New York, C. & St. L. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API