Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 14, 1927No. C-28PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice

There are three items involved in the claim in this case, and as to two of them, $3,453.83 and $480.26, with a deduction to be noted, the plaintiff is clearly entitled to recover. These two items represent the difference between 100 per cent land-grant deduction over part of the route and the 50 per cent land-grant deduction which was applicable under the act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. 361). This difference has not been paid. The third item, amounting to $2,215.50, presents a different question. The petition alleges that the *87amount claimed in the three items “ has not been paid ”, to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Baird v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API