Legal Opinion

Karcz v. Luther Manufacturing Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 13, 1959PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

These are two actions of contract, each by a former employee of the defendant, to recover retirement separation pay alleged to be payable under a labor agreement between the defendant and the union of which each plaintiff was a member. A judge of the Superior Court sitting without a jury found for the defendant in each case. The plaintiffs’ consolidated bill of exceptions presents the issue of the propriety of the denial of various rulings requested by the plaintiffs, respectively, and the granting of various rulings requested by the defendant.

The following facts appear from the bill of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. In Re Public Ledger, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  4. McCarroll v. Los Angeles County District Council of CarpentersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Carnig v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Lucas v. Seagrave CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1967
  3. Frank X. Losacco v. F.D. Rich Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. Van Pelt v. Berefco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. Amoco Oil Co. v. DicksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API